Re: reality is a reflection
Verfasst: 14 Jan 2022, 13:03
Session 141:
“I will now close a most excellent session. (“Good night, Seth.” (End at 10:37. Jane was well dissociated as usual. (She reported that at the end of the session she received a strong emotional feeling from Seth. It was directed toward us and was to this effect: “Through action, see how I’m a part of you both now, and how foolish it is of you to worry about identities, when all identities are so bound together.”
Session 141:
“And yet each action, or entity, is a part of another, and is both within and without another. And none of it is meaningless, and yet in a basic manner all of it has the meaning that you give it. And what meaning you give it is there, and part of it, since you who project the meaning are yourselves part of it. The inner self is, therefore, that inner portion of action which forms the egos, and the selves, through the dilemmas of which I have spoken. Part of the self knows, and knows that it knows. Part of the self knows, and does not know it knows. The creative dilemmas of which I have spoken are the basis for all realities, and the heart of all meaning.”
----------------------
Aaron: “Waves clearly have existence. You can even say they have a, let’s not call it ultimate existence, but they exist beyond that wave, because they’re all part of the ocean and the sea is vast. Is the ocean limited to the ocean? Water evaporates, is lifted up into the heavens, comes down as rain and as snow. The ocean is on the mountain top in a heavy snow pile. The ocean is melting and pouring down the mountain in rivers and streams flowing back out to the sea. The ocean is in the gardens and the forests, soaked into the earth. The ocean is in the trees. It’s in your vegetables. It’s in you, each time you drink a glass of water. There is nothing that you can look out and see, no other person or animal or growing thing, that is not the ocean. And yet, each wave has a limitation. It grows, slaps down, and comes rolling up onto the beach”
---------------------
A cube within a cube within a cube within a cube: here are pictures to visualize 5th dimension:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFvUaFuv5Uw
From the above I understand that there may be a life, created by materializing frames 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, etc. and another incarnation making use of reality frames 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, etc., thereby creating an entirely different reality experience where the second self knows nothing about its parallel existence in the first reality (frames 5, 10, 15, 20, 25). Frames 5 and 10 become part of (the 'history' of) frame 15, along the way of materializing the frames for that specific first existence. Frames 5 and 10 will never be lost. They are contained (by integration) in the self which is forming/materialising frame 15, once that self has 'reached' frame 15. And frames 5, 10, AND frame 15 are then contained in frame 20. Thus, the 'now-moment I-am-ness' of frame 20 contains the former 'now-moment I-am-ness-es' that the former version(s) of that self experiences/experienced when it was 'younger', let's say at the age of ten. These specific experiences are contained by integration (5th dimension) and never lost (holographic principle). On a larger level, a self transcending a specific narrowly defined incarnation (a self after death, or the entity) does in fact include frames 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 PLUS frames 6, 11, 16, 21, i.e. the frames of the second incarnation, where the active self (while being active 'in' that second incarnation) knows nothing about the first incarnation (frames 5, 10, 15, 20). Everything is contained in and forms an integral part of everything else, but it is not necessarily perceived as such.
According to Tom Campbell there are three databases:
a) all future possibilities (to be chosen and materialized at the rate of Planck time)
b) all past possibilities (unchosen by us and - according to Seth too slow for materialization for our synapses, NoPR)
c) all the frames which were actually chosen (from database a) and materialized along our route
This is actually the reason why and how Basher could say that after ‘shifting’ from one frame to another, you are no longer the same ‘you’ you were a moment ago: “…that was another you…that is (sic!) another you.”
“I will now close a most excellent session. (“Good night, Seth.” (End at 10:37. Jane was well dissociated as usual. (She reported that at the end of the session she received a strong emotional feeling from Seth. It was directed toward us and was to this effect: “Through action, see how I’m a part of you both now, and how foolish it is of you to worry about identities, when all identities are so bound together.”
Session 141:
“And yet each action, or entity, is a part of another, and is both within and without another. And none of it is meaningless, and yet in a basic manner all of it has the meaning that you give it. And what meaning you give it is there, and part of it, since you who project the meaning are yourselves part of it. The inner self is, therefore, that inner portion of action which forms the egos, and the selves, through the dilemmas of which I have spoken. Part of the self knows, and knows that it knows. Part of the self knows, and does not know it knows. The creative dilemmas of which I have spoken are the basis for all realities, and the heart of all meaning.”
----------------------
Aaron: “Waves clearly have existence. You can even say they have a, let’s not call it ultimate existence, but they exist beyond that wave, because they’re all part of the ocean and the sea is vast. Is the ocean limited to the ocean? Water evaporates, is lifted up into the heavens, comes down as rain and as snow. The ocean is on the mountain top in a heavy snow pile. The ocean is melting and pouring down the mountain in rivers and streams flowing back out to the sea. The ocean is in the gardens and the forests, soaked into the earth. The ocean is in the trees. It’s in your vegetables. It’s in you, each time you drink a glass of water. There is nothing that you can look out and see, no other person or animal or growing thing, that is not the ocean. And yet, each wave has a limitation. It grows, slaps down, and comes rolling up onto the beach”
---------------------
A cube within a cube within a cube within a cube: here are pictures to visualize 5th dimension:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFvUaFuv5Uw
From the above I understand that there may be a life, created by materializing frames 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, etc. and another incarnation making use of reality frames 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, etc., thereby creating an entirely different reality experience where the second self knows nothing about its parallel existence in the first reality (frames 5, 10, 15, 20, 25). Frames 5 and 10 become part of (the 'history' of) frame 15, along the way of materializing the frames for that specific first existence. Frames 5 and 10 will never be lost. They are contained (by integration) in the self which is forming/materialising frame 15, once that self has 'reached' frame 15. And frames 5, 10, AND frame 15 are then contained in frame 20. Thus, the 'now-moment I-am-ness' of frame 20 contains the former 'now-moment I-am-ness-es' that the former version(s) of that self experiences/experienced when it was 'younger', let's say at the age of ten. These specific experiences are contained by integration (5th dimension) and never lost (holographic principle). On a larger level, a self transcending a specific narrowly defined incarnation (a self after death, or the entity) does in fact include frames 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 PLUS frames 6, 11, 16, 21, i.e. the frames of the second incarnation, where the active self (while being active 'in' that second incarnation) knows nothing about the first incarnation (frames 5, 10, 15, 20). Everything is contained in and forms an integral part of everything else, but it is not necessarily perceived as such.
According to Tom Campbell there are three databases:
a) all future possibilities (to be chosen and materialized at the rate of Planck time)
b) all past possibilities (unchosen by us and - according to Seth too slow for materialization for our synapses, NoPR)
c) all the frames which were actually chosen (from database a) and materialized along our route
This is actually the reason why and how Basher could say that after ‘shifting’ from one frame to another, you are no longer the same ‘you’ you were a moment ago: “…that was another you…that is (sic!) another you.”