This book was highly recommended by Bashar a few years ago: `A.D. After Disclosure´, by Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel. The problem is not only how do we assimilate the information that we are not alone in the universe. It is also - and possibly more so - a question of how democracies can still thrive once people are informed that they have been systematically lied at over several decades.
--------------------------
(text from Amazon):
""What if the UFO cover-up is real and what if it ended? After Disclosure poses this fascinating question and looks at the societal consequences of such a revelation. Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel have produced a thoughtful and provocative analysis that goes well beyond the usual scope of books on UFOs and alien life." —Nick Pope, Former Chief of UK Ministry of Defence UFO Desk
What if UFO secrecy ended tomorrow? The transition from B.C. (Before Confirmation) to A.D. (After Disclosure) is the ultimate "what if?" scenario in which the calendar is reset and history begins again.
This work of speculative non-fiction combines meticulous fact-finding from historian/researcher Richard M. Dolan and forward-leaning scenarios from journalist/screenwriter Bryce Zabel on the world's most mind-bending subject. The authors predict radical changes after official acknowledgment that at least some UFOs are intelligently controlled craft from somewhere other than Earth. A.D. After Disclosure isn't afraid to make mind-blowing, specific predictions, such as:
Congress will hold Watergate-style hearings and ask secret-keepers, "What did you know and when did you know it?"
The first decade A.D. (After Disclosure) will be like a high-tech 1960s, spawning massive cultural and societal change.
Abductees will file a class-action suit against the government for withholding critical information.
All the textbooks on planet Earth--from history to science--will need an immediate review.
Whether disclosure leads to social panic or ushers in a new era of unity and peace, it will undoubtedly be a game-changing event."
Re: reality is a reflection
242Rear Admiral Timothy Gallaudet: "The American Public has a right to know the new nature of reality we know." more. 6 hours ago • disclosureorg.
https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12 ... 241113.pdf
https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12 ... 241113.pdf
Re: reality is a reflection
243The 12-page document 'that your government says does not exist'
Earlier in the hearing, co-chair Nancy Mace held up a 12-page report on Immaculate Constellation which she said was an "unacknowledged special access programme that your government says does not exist".
Michael Shellenberger, founder of the 'Public' news service, delivered the report to Congress and told the hearing a current or former official who is a UAP whistleblower has written the report that says "the executive branch has been managing UAPs without congressional knowledge or authorisation for some time, possibly decades".
Mr Shellenberger said the report said Immaculate Constellation brings together observations of UAPs, and includes high-quality imagery intelligence.
https://mace.house.gov/immaculateconstellation
Earlier in the hearing, co-chair Nancy Mace held up a 12-page report on Immaculate Constellation which she said was an "unacknowledged special access programme that your government says does not exist".
Michael Shellenberger, founder of the 'Public' news service, delivered the report to Congress and told the hearing a current or former official who is a UAP whistleblower has written the report that says "the executive branch has been managing UAPs without congressional knowledge or authorisation for some time, possibly decades".
Mr Shellenberger said the report said Immaculate Constellation brings together observations of UAPs, and includes high-quality imagery intelligence.
https://mace.house.gov/immaculateconstellation
Re: reality is a reflection
244Q.: Will not sending the letters change our timeline? (13:40)
B.: As I said it´s up to you to determine what steps you wish to participate in. So that´s completely up to you. You cannot look it as this idea as a group because everyone will have slight differences in terms of how they approach this. So it´s not really one group that either is or isn´t doing the steps. The steps will be done in different ways by different individuals to different degrees. We are tracking everything as we need to, don´t worry about it. Just participate in whatever way you can, but again, be willing to look at your own belief systems about why you may or may not be participating. If there are any fear-based beliefs, negative beliefs that come up, that prevent you from participating, then the purpose is to examine those beliefs and see if you can let them go so that you´ll be more willing to participate. And again, some of that coming up within you is part of the reason why we suggested what we suggested. Because we are watching the degree of willingness that people have in involving themselves in this process that they look at those beliefs that come up and the willingness to let go or change them is part of the social experiment that we are observing.
Q.: Fear of prosecution when sending out the letters (15:20)
B.: Yes again, what I just said. Part of the process of presenting this social experiment is also to allow people to come to terms with the idea of their beliefs about open contact, what effects that might have on their lives and what effect the idea of interaction with other humans in that process might also have on their lives, so that they can face those particular fear-based and negative beliefs and take the opportunity to deal with them and let them go. So that´s part of the social experiment is to discover fear-based beliefs within yourself and deal with why you´re holding on to that and why you think that you are in any way, shape or form at risk. So, just allow yourself to explore those fear-based beliefs, those negative beliefs. See if you can let any of them go, and see if in letting some of them go you find yourself more willing to participate in the social experiment in the way that we have suggested. But again, it´s up to you. But certainly you can use this opportunity to get in touch with any fear-based beliefs in the normal course of your life anyway. So that´s part of the social experiment is this what comes up in each and every one of you
(Social Experiment Step Four, May 2024)
https://socialexperiment.notion.site/In ... aab?pvs=74
Click on the flags and you get the contact details of the respective delegates and decision-makers to the extent that their addresses have been compiled, e.g. 700 in the case of the EU.
B.: As I said it´s up to you to determine what steps you wish to participate in. So that´s completely up to you. You cannot look it as this idea as a group because everyone will have slight differences in terms of how they approach this. So it´s not really one group that either is or isn´t doing the steps. The steps will be done in different ways by different individuals to different degrees. We are tracking everything as we need to, don´t worry about it. Just participate in whatever way you can, but again, be willing to look at your own belief systems about why you may or may not be participating. If there are any fear-based beliefs, negative beliefs that come up, that prevent you from participating, then the purpose is to examine those beliefs and see if you can let them go so that you´ll be more willing to participate. And again, some of that coming up within you is part of the reason why we suggested what we suggested. Because we are watching the degree of willingness that people have in involving themselves in this process that they look at those beliefs that come up and the willingness to let go or change them is part of the social experiment that we are observing.
Q.: Fear of prosecution when sending out the letters (15:20)
B.: Yes again, what I just said. Part of the process of presenting this social experiment is also to allow people to come to terms with the idea of their beliefs about open contact, what effects that might have on their lives and what effect the idea of interaction with other humans in that process might also have on their lives, so that they can face those particular fear-based and negative beliefs and take the opportunity to deal with them and let them go. So that´s part of the social experiment is to discover fear-based beliefs within yourself and deal with why you´re holding on to that and why you think that you are in any way, shape or form at risk. So, just allow yourself to explore those fear-based beliefs, those negative beliefs. See if you can let any of them go, and see if in letting some of them go you find yourself more willing to participate in the social experiment in the way that we have suggested. But again, it´s up to you. But certainly you can use this opportunity to get in touch with any fear-based beliefs in the normal course of your life anyway. So that´s part of the social experiment is this what comes up in each and every one of you
(Social Experiment Step Four, May 2024)
https://socialexperiment.notion.site/In ... aab?pvs=74
Click on the flags and you get the contact details of the respective delegates and decision-makers to the extent that their addresses have been compiled, e.g. 700 in the case of the EU.
Re: reality is a reflection
245`Echoes of Sedona´, 23 Nov. 2024
Bashar´s monologue on yt (plus transcript)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPtwS1lByL8
-----------------------
the WW III-related part:
Q.: `Is WW III coming?´
B.: `We talked about the idea of the imbalanced energy that is typically referred to as masculinity, might lead in that direction, it doesn´t mean it will happen. It will lead in that direction. Remember, the idea of what you might refer to as WW III does not necessarily have to be and never will be a nuclear exchange. So the idea is that it may lead by an imbalance of energy that are typically referred to as masculine-style energies of agressiveness, will lead closer and closer to the idea of what you will experience or call WW III. Again, it doesn´t mean it will actually happen if you are willing to understand what we are saying to you in this transmission today.
We are now speaking on behalf of the Interstellar Alliance Council. And we are giving you the result of the discussions that are ongoing in this Council. So we would strongly encourage you to pay attention to the way in which information is being given to you, to listen to the wording, for it is precise. We said things would lead in certain directions, not that it was inevitable. But nevertheless, by allowing yourselves to begin through communication, you can pull yourselves back to the center to be with one another and to empower yourselves in a multitude of ways that will allow you to dispel the veil that you think is your political reality, which is nothing but a smokescreen for what is really going on behind the scene. So that you can truly open your eyes and see your world for what it is and how you can truly decide together to change it in ways that will allow you to join the Galactic Community in a positive way.´
Q.: `When you made your statement in Sedona (I presuming you) that the outcome of the election would be the male winning, knowingness you´re taking responsibility comment makes sense, that we must take responsibility for this path that we´ve chosen. If we voted for the female what does it mean to take responsibility here?´
B.: `What it means is that at this point as we have said it doesn´t matter who you voted for. Taking responsibility is taking responsibility to your reaction and response to the transmission that we delivered. That´s what we mean by taking responsibility. And we are now discussing the idea of the actions necessary to take responsibility for your responses and reactions. By coming together, and having open discussions, clear discussions, by understanding each other, by listening to each other, by really talking with each other. This is what´s important now and would be a true expression of your willingness to take responsibility for the initial reactions and responses that you had to our comments in our transmission. This is now what we are watching. This is now what we are observing. This is what´s important to move forward, no matter who you voted for, no matter what your election is. As we said: this is a play, playing out, and what´s going on behind the scenes is actually more about what´s really going on on your planet than it is in terms of the play act that happens to be your election. For that is a screen.´
Bashar´s monologue on yt (plus transcript)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPtwS1lByL8
-----------------------
the WW III-related part:
Q.: `Is WW III coming?´
B.: `We talked about the idea of the imbalanced energy that is typically referred to as masculinity, might lead in that direction, it doesn´t mean it will happen. It will lead in that direction. Remember, the idea of what you might refer to as WW III does not necessarily have to be and never will be a nuclear exchange. So the idea is that it may lead by an imbalance of energy that are typically referred to as masculine-style energies of agressiveness, will lead closer and closer to the idea of what you will experience or call WW III. Again, it doesn´t mean it will actually happen if you are willing to understand what we are saying to you in this transmission today.
We are now speaking on behalf of the Interstellar Alliance Council. And we are giving you the result of the discussions that are ongoing in this Council. So we would strongly encourage you to pay attention to the way in which information is being given to you, to listen to the wording, for it is precise. We said things would lead in certain directions, not that it was inevitable. But nevertheless, by allowing yourselves to begin through communication, you can pull yourselves back to the center to be with one another and to empower yourselves in a multitude of ways that will allow you to dispel the veil that you think is your political reality, which is nothing but a smokescreen for what is really going on behind the scene. So that you can truly open your eyes and see your world for what it is and how you can truly decide together to change it in ways that will allow you to join the Galactic Community in a positive way.´
Q.: `When you made your statement in Sedona (I presuming you) that the outcome of the election would be the male winning, knowingness you´re taking responsibility comment makes sense, that we must take responsibility for this path that we´ve chosen. If we voted for the female what does it mean to take responsibility here?´
B.: `What it means is that at this point as we have said it doesn´t matter who you voted for. Taking responsibility is taking responsibility to your reaction and response to the transmission that we delivered. That´s what we mean by taking responsibility. And we are now discussing the idea of the actions necessary to take responsibility for your responses and reactions. By coming together, and having open discussions, clear discussions, by understanding each other, by listening to each other, by really talking with each other. This is what´s important now and would be a true expression of your willingness to take responsibility for the initial reactions and responses that you had to our comments in our transmission. This is now what we are watching. This is now what we are observing. This is what´s important to move forward, no matter who you voted for, no matter what your election is. As we said: this is a play, playing out, and what´s going on behind the scenes is actually more about what´s really going on on your planet than it is in terms of the play act that happens to be your election. For that is a screen.´
Re: reality is a reflection
246`Echoes of Sedona´
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdkSO4d ... &index=563
`Facing Your Demons´
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6HjBEQ ... &index=561
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdkSO4d ... &index=563
`Facing Your Demons´
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6HjBEQ ... &index=561
Re: reality is a reflection
247Soul and Oversoul (Echoes of Sedona)
Q.: `The Oversoul was described as the hand with the different fingers as the individual souls. Does each individual soul have multiple physical beings associated with it?´
B.: `Over the course of time it can appear that way and that´s what you typically refer to from your linear perspective as reincarnation. Because the soul, being an energy sphere, creates the body within itself out of certain vibrations that represent the challenge that that soul wishes to experience to help it grow. When the soul returns to its full form, its full shape, in other words, when the physical body has `died´or expanded back to the idea of the soul perspective, then it can choose different vibrations to create a different personality to have a different experience, linearly speaking. Therefore you could say that that is really the way reincarnation works, but the idea is that every new personality also has a different soul because the configuration of vibrational patterns within the soul that created that different body had to also be different, and therefore it is, in a sense, a different soul. Does that make sense? It just depends on the perspective, subjectively, that you´re coming from when you describe this process as to how you experience it.´
Q.: `Are the different beings of the same soul in different realities at the same time?´
B.: `Oh, you are talking about parallel realities. That´s a little bit different than the idea of the reincarnational realities that we just described. It´s a type of parallel reality, but there are actually multiple types of parallel realities. So again it depends on - subjectively - which type you are actually referring to. If you´re referring to the idea that there may be what you would think of as multiple versions of yourself, experiencing different pathways, that´s one type of parallel reality structure.´
Q.: `From one soul when it expands and then it contracts and creates another entity, is that a different personality, not me, but a different entity?´
B.: `Oh yes, it´s not you, it´s a different entity. And the soul is different as well. Because again, it´s creating that different personality out of different vibratory frequencies within its energy. So in a sense, you can say from one perspective: yes, it´s the same soul, creating another physical body, but from another perspective you could say: but that´s a different soul because it´s made up of different energy patterns because it has given different patterns to the physical body, and therefore those patterns don´t exist within the soul anymore at that level. It´s a different soul. Cause it´s a different formula of vibrational frequencies in order to create that different, unique personality out of those different frequencies.´
(Echoes of Sedona, 2024)
--------------------------------------
From the above it seems that the soul is a `personality-generating, timeless powerhouse´, and the identities assumed by the generated personalities are neither identical with the soul as powerhouse, nor any of the other personalities that may be generated by the same soul. The hand with the fingers becomes a fractal conglomerate, comprising a multitude of independent identities/entities. And somehow they are all still interconnected.
Basically, we are all electromagnetic frequencies (Seth) and the soul is an infinite, multidimensional act (Seth).
Q.: `The Oversoul was described as the hand with the different fingers as the individual souls. Does each individual soul have multiple physical beings associated with it?´
B.: `Over the course of time it can appear that way and that´s what you typically refer to from your linear perspective as reincarnation. Because the soul, being an energy sphere, creates the body within itself out of certain vibrations that represent the challenge that that soul wishes to experience to help it grow. When the soul returns to its full form, its full shape, in other words, when the physical body has `died´or expanded back to the idea of the soul perspective, then it can choose different vibrations to create a different personality to have a different experience, linearly speaking. Therefore you could say that that is really the way reincarnation works, but the idea is that every new personality also has a different soul because the configuration of vibrational patterns within the soul that created that different body had to also be different, and therefore it is, in a sense, a different soul. Does that make sense? It just depends on the perspective, subjectively, that you´re coming from when you describe this process as to how you experience it.´
Q.: `Are the different beings of the same soul in different realities at the same time?´
B.: `Oh, you are talking about parallel realities. That´s a little bit different than the idea of the reincarnational realities that we just described. It´s a type of parallel reality, but there are actually multiple types of parallel realities. So again it depends on - subjectively - which type you are actually referring to. If you´re referring to the idea that there may be what you would think of as multiple versions of yourself, experiencing different pathways, that´s one type of parallel reality structure.´
Q.: `From one soul when it expands and then it contracts and creates another entity, is that a different personality, not me, but a different entity?´
B.: `Oh yes, it´s not you, it´s a different entity. And the soul is different as well. Because again, it´s creating that different personality out of different vibratory frequencies within its energy. So in a sense, you can say from one perspective: yes, it´s the same soul, creating another physical body, but from another perspective you could say: but that´s a different soul because it´s made up of different energy patterns because it has given different patterns to the physical body, and therefore those patterns don´t exist within the soul anymore at that level. It´s a different soul. Cause it´s a different formula of vibrational frequencies in order to create that different, unique personality out of those different frequencies.´
(Echoes of Sedona, 2024)
--------------------------------------
From the above it seems that the soul is a `personality-generating, timeless powerhouse´, and the identities assumed by the generated personalities are neither identical with the soul as powerhouse, nor any of the other personalities that may be generated by the same soul. The hand with the fingers becomes a fractal conglomerate, comprising a multitude of independent identities/entities. And somehow they are all still interconnected.
Basically, we are all electromagnetic frequencies (Seth) and the soul is an infinite, multidimensional act (Seth).
Re: reality is a reflection
248What the Oracle said at the end of the transmission (Echoes of Sedona)
Bashar: `We will now add and allow and facilitate what the Oracle will say.
Once again, we remind you, before the Oracle speaks, the two most important things that we have shared with all of you at this time on your planet to move you toward contact in a positive, creative, peaceful, harmonious way, is to remember that it´s not about what happens. It´s about what you do with what happens that makes the difference, and to stay in a positive state, no matter what manifests, so that you can get a benefit from it. Remember those two things, along with what the Oracle now has to say. Again, we encourage you, since the Oracle will repeat this three times in this transmission, to write it down, so there is no misunderstanding and again, I remind you, we completely leave it up to you to understand, to divine the meaning and the mystery in the interpretation of what the Oracle will say. We will not help you with this. This is left in your hand. But use it creatively, come from your heart, come from your soul. Everything will be fine. Everything will be fine.
We will now allow the facilitation of the Oracle who will repeat the transmission three times. ´
Oracle:
`The dark night of the soul calls forth the light within. And when the light of truth comes forth, the blind shall see once again.
The dark night of the soul calls forth the light within. And when the light of truth comes forth, the blind shall see once again.
The dark night of the soul calls forth the light within. And once the light of truth comes forth, the blind shall see once again.´
Bashar: `This is a being from the Interstellar Alliance Council. Again, it translates in your language simply as the Oracle. This was an oracular transmission, there may be more in the future, as we get closer to the idea of open contact. We will leave it to you to ponder the mysteries inherent within the oracular transmission.´
-----------------------------
This was presented by Bashar as a kind of highlight at the end of the session. He advised us explicitly to write it down so that there is no misunderstanding.
Please note: the statement was given by the Oracle once and repeated twice, not three times. The second repetition is slightly different than the statement itself.
Bashar: `We will now add and allow and facilitate what the Oracle will say.
Once again, we remind you, before the Oracle speaks, the two most important things that we have shared with all of you at this time on your planet to move you toward contact in a positive, creative, peaceful, harmonious way, is to remember that it´s not about what happens. It´s about what you do with what happens that makes the difference, and to stay in a positive state, no matter what manifests, so that you can get a benefit from it. Remember those two things, along with what the Oracle now has to say. Again, we encourage you, since the Oracle will repeat this three times in this transmission, to write it down, so there is no misunderstanding and again, I remind you, we completely leave it up to you to understand, to divine the meaning and the mystery in the interpretation of what the Oracle will say. We will not help you with this. This is left in your hand. But use it creatively, come from your heart, come from your soul. Everything will be fine. Everything will be fine.
We will now allow the facilitation of the Oracle who will repeat the transmission three times. ´
Oracle:
`The dark night of the soul calls forth the light within. And when the light of truth comes forth, the blind shall see once again.
The dark night of the soul calls forth the light within. And when the light of truth comes forth, the blind shall see once again.
The dark night of the soul calls forth the light within. And once the light of truth comes forth, the blind shall see once again.´
Bashar: `This is a being from the Interstellar Alliance Council. Again, it translates in your language simply as the Oracle. This was an oracular transmission, there may be more in the future, as we get closer to the idea of open contact. We will leave it to you to ponder the mysteries inherent within the oracular transmission.´
-----------------------------
This was presented by Bashar as a kind of highlight at the end of the session. He advised us explicitly to write it down so that there is no misunderstanding.
Please note: the statement was given by the Oracle once and repeated twice, not three times. The second repetition is slightly different than the statement itself.
Re: reality is a reflection
249by: fastinguy11 on reddit (r/Bashar_Essassani)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bashar_Essassa ... eflecting/
„When Bashar speaks of physical reality as a reflection, he’s addressing the idea that what we perceive as the world around us is more like a custom-generated feedback system rather than a self-contained, independent environment. According to this perspective, what appears “outside” is not truly separate. Instead, our higher mind projects a field of energy that acts as a boundary or container within which we find ourselves. This energetic bubble does not simply surround us; it actively responds to our beliefs, emotions, and overall state of being, producing scenarios and imagery that match who we are at our core. It’s like existing inside a dynamic mirror that adapts moment by moment to our internal signals.
This line of thought is mirrored in various teachings. Abraham-Hicks, for instance, often emphasizes that we broadcast a vibration and reality responds in kind. For Abraham-Hicks, the circumstances, events, and people we encounter can be seen as direct indicators of what we are emitting. Seth, channeled by Jane Roberts, presents a similar framework: each individual’s consciousness structures experience, forming matter and events from what Seth calls inner blueprints. These blueprints arise from thoughts, expectations, and intentions, then appear outwardly as “real” conditions. The physical world is like a carefully arranged stage, a perfect reflection of the inner creative source that we often remain unaware of.
Consider the higher mind as a projector and the physical senses as interpretive tools. The bubble of energy described by Bashar is not just a passive field; it has a kind of intelligence. It selects, shapes, and then displays possibilities in a way that gives us the chance to understand our inner workings. Every time we experience a challenging situation, a repetitive pattern in relationships, or even a surprising stroke of luck, it’s not just random chance. Instead, these happenings can be regarded as reflections of particular thoughts and states we hold—some conscious, some buried. The purpose is not to trick or mislead us but to provide a running commentary on our current alignment, helping us see clearly what we might otherwise ignore.
This idea often ties into the concept of parallel realities and the notion that we constantly shift through countless versions of ourselves and our world. Bashar and others suggest that our higher mind orchestrates these shifts based on our dominant vibrations. When we consciously alter our focus, refine our intentions, or release outdated beliefs, the mirrorlike field surrounding us changes correspondingly. This can result in new opportunities, new relationships, and an environment that feels markedly different, even if some superficial elements remain the same.
Teachers aligned with the Pleiadian, Arcturian, or other galactic sources often describe a multi-layered structure of consciousness. We have the immediate personality—our everyday self—and several “higher” aspects that operate at levels we rarely consider. The higher mind is one such aspect: it resides in a non-physical domain and communicates with us through intuition, inspiration, and moments of sudden clarity. Although we may think of the higher mind as distant, it’s actually inseparable from who we are. Its energetic bubble is like a personal reality container, holding the ingredients of our life and arranging them into patterns that reflect our current frequency.
This doesn’t negate the shared or collective aspects of reality. Many teachers explain that while each individual experiences their own reflective bubble, we also interface with others who project their own patterns and energies. The intersections of these fields create a collective stage where we can learn from each other. Even so, our personal experience is always filtered through our unique bubble, ensuring that the version of reality we perceive is always customized to our inner state.
What Bashar points toward is a radical shift in perspective: rather than thinking of ourselves as separate beings navigating a fixed external world, we can recognize that we’re both the observer and the creator, constantly generating and experiencing reflections of ourselves. This shift empowers us to take ownership of the patterns we see. If something unpleasant appears again and again, we can start to look within, asking what beliefs or emotions are responsible for this repetition. On the other hand, when we experience synchronicity, ease, or a certain kind of grace, that too is a reflection of something positive and coherent within us.
Expanding even further, some teachings link this model of reality to quantum phenomena. While many channeled sources do not attempt to rigorously validate their concepts in scientific terms, the idea that observers influence outcomes at a fundamental level is well-known in quantum physics. Though not identical, there’s a poetic parallel: just as quantum experiments suggest that observation affects what is observed, Bashar’s model suggests that our state of consciousness affects what reality shows us. The higher mind can be seen as the ultimate observer, setting the stage so that our physical personality can learn, grow, and discover its creative power.
In practical terms, understanding this can help a person become more mindful of their inner life. If we accept that we live inside a reflective bubble shaped by the higher mind, we might become more careful about our emotional patterns, more willing to adjust long-held beliefs, and more open to reinterpreting unwanted events as feedback rather than punishment. Over time, this can lead to an empowered approach to life, where every external situation—even ones that feel difficult—becomes a clue pointing to something within us that can be understood or shifted.
Bashar’s explanation that physical reality is a reflection orchestrated by the higher mind offers a far-reaching view of how our lives take shape. It suggests that nothing is truly random, that we’re never victims of circumstances, and that each moment can serve as a guidepost, showing us who we are and what we’re projecting. It’s a vision of existence where the boundary between “inside” and “outside” dissolves into a continuous interplay of consciousness and manifestation. In other words, we’re not just living in the world; we’re generating it through our higher mind’s reflective bubble of energy, experiencing a steady flow of customized feedback that shows us exactly where we stand in relation to our own boundless potential.“
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bashar_Essassa ... eflecting/
„When Bashar speaks of physical reality as a reflection, he’s addressing the idea that what we perceive as the world around us is more like a custom-generated feedback system rather than a self-contained, independent environment. According to this perspective, what appears “outside” is not truly separate. Instead, our higher mind projects a field of energy that acts as a boundary or container within which we find ourselves. This energetic bubble does not simply surround us; it actively responds to our beliefs, emotions, and overall state of being, producing scenarios and imagery that match who we are at our core. It’s like existing inside a dynamic mirror that adapts moment by moment to our internal signals.
This line of thought is mirrored in various teachings. Abraham-Hicks, for instance, often emphasizes that we broadcast a vibration and reality responds in kind. For Abraham-Hicks, the circumstances, events, and people we encounter can be seen as direct indicators of what we are emitting. Seth, channeled by Jane Roberts, presents a similar framework: each individual’s consciousness structures experience, forming matter and events from what Seth calls inner blueprints. These blueprints arise from thoughts, expectations, and intentions, then appear outwardly as “real” conditions. The physical world is like a carefully arranged stage, a perfect reflection of the inner creative source that we often remain unaware of.
Consider the higher mind as a projector and the physical senses as interpretive tools. The bubble of energy described by Bashar is not just a passive field; it has a kind of intelligence. It selects, shapes, and then displays possibilities in a way that gives us the chance to understand our inner workings. Every time we experience a challenging situation, a repetitive pattern in relationships, or even a surprising stroke of luck, it’s not just random chance. Instead, these happenings can be regarded as reflections of particular thoughts and states we hold—some conscious, some buried. The purpose is not to trick or mislead us but to provide a running commentary on our current alignment, helping us see clearly what we might otherwise ignore.
This idea often ties into the concept of parallel realities and the notion that we constantly shift through countless versions of ourselves and our world. Bashar and others suggest that our higher mind orchestrates these shifts based on our dominant vibrations. When we consciously alter our focus, refine our intentions, or release outdated beliefs, the mirrorlike field surrounding us changes correspondingly. This can result in new opportunities, new relationships, and an environment that feels markedly different, even if some superficial elements remain the same.
Teachers aligned with the Pleiadian, Arcturian, or other galactic sources often describe a multi-layered structure of consciousness. We have the immediate personality—our everyday self—and several “higher” aspects that operate at levels we rarely consider. The higher mind is one such aspect: it resides in a non-physical domain and communicates with us through intuition, inspiration, and moments of sudden clarity. Although we may think of the higher mind as distant, it’s actually inseparable from who we are. Its energetic bubble is like a personal reality container, holding the ingredients of our life and arranging them into patterns that reflect our current frequency.
This doesn’t negate the shared or collective aspects of reality. Many teachers explain that while each individual experiences their own reflective bubble, we also interface with others who project their own patterns and energies. The intersections of these fields create a collective stage where we can learn from each other. Even so, our personal experience is always filtered through our unique bubble, ensuring that the version of reality we perceive is always customized to our inner state.
What Bashar points toward is a radical shift in perspective: rather than thinking of ourselves as separate beings navigating a fixed external world, we can recognize that we’re both the observer and the creator, constantly generating and experiencing reflections of ourselves. This shift empowers us to take ownership of the patterns we see. If something unpleasant appears again and again, we can start to look within, asking what beliefs or emotions are responsible for this repetition. On the other hand, when we experience synchronicity, ease, or a certain kind of grace, that too is a reflection of something positive and coherent within us.
Expanding even further, some teachings link this model of reality to quantum phenomena. While many channeled sources do not attempt to rigorously validate their concepts in scientific terms, the idea that observers influence outcomes at a fundamental level is well-known in quantum physics. Though not identical, there’s a poetic parallel: just as quantum experiments suggest that observation affects what is observed, Bashar’s model suggests that our state of consciousness affects what reality shows us. The higher mind can be seen as the ultimate observer, setting the stage so that our physical personality can learn, grow, and discover its creative power.
In practical terms, understanding this can help a person become more mindful of their inner life. If we accept that we live inside a reflective bubble shaped by the higher mind, we might become more careful about our emotional patterns, more willing to adjust long-held beliefs, and more open to reinterpreting unwanted events as feedback rather than punishment. Over time, this can lead to an empowered approach to life, where every external situation—even ones that feel difficult—becomes a clue pointing to something within us that can be understood or shifted.
Bashar’s explanation that physical reality is a reflection orchestrated by the higher mind offers a far-reaching view of how our lives take shape. It suggests that nothing is truly random, that we’re never victims of circumstances, and that each moment can serve as a guidepost, showing us who we are and what we’re projecting. It’s a vision of existence where the boundary between “inside” and “outside” dissolves into a continuous interplay of consciousness and manifestation. In other words, we’re not just living in the world; we’re generating it through our higher mind’s reflective bubble of energy, experiencing a steady flow of customized feedback that shows us exactly where we stand in relation to our own boundless potential.“