Re: reality is a reflection

94
According to Bashar everything that Seth is saying is correct, though the terminology is used differently. Therefore, it would make sense to systematically align his understanding of the cosmos and All-that-Is with the information provided by Seth.

Seth's books have to be read word by word. Going for the ‘general gist' is not sufficient. Key in understanding his teachings is the nested character of consciousness - like the consciousness of an atom 'vis-a-vis' the consciousness of a cell composed of that atom 'vis-a-vis' the consciousness of an organ composed of those cells 'vis-a-vis' the consciousness of an 'animate being' composed of those organs.

According to some physicists (Tom Campbell, Jim Elvidge) everything is based on a grid of 'reality producing points' far below the level of subatomic particles (the size of one Planck lenghth). Like the pixels on a TV screen which are constantly reproducing the picture. Reality is similarly reproduced moment by moment by moment. Thus the universe is constantly being recreated and renewed (like an interactive video game on a computer screen). We are playing roles in the scenarios on the screen, but we are composed of those pixels.

According to Seth, the universe is 'blinking'. According to Tom Campbell the universe is 'ticking' (at the rate of Planck time). According to Bashar, we are 'recreating the universe billions of times per second', i.e. the 'shifting', and every one is in his or her own universe. At the rate of Planck time (Bashar).

According to the information provided by means of the 'Kris Chronicles', the pixels are the 'units of consciousness', in: ‘Soundlets II’.

Kris: „Man könnte sagen, obwohl dies ziemlich grob formuliert wäre, dass man das gesamte Gitterwerk der von Euch so verstandenen Realität herunterbrechen könnte in Pixel, und in diesem Falle sind die Bewusstseinseinheiten die Pixel, unendlich klein dem Aussehen nach, unendlich groß in der Menge und den Informationseigenschaften, was das Fundament selbst des Empfindungsvermögens ist, welches Dir und Dir und dem Tier hier (deutet auf alle, auch auf den Hund) die Fähigkeit verschafft, sich selbst als sich selbst zu verstehen.“

Re: reality is a reflection

96
The following excerpt from an Elias session (No 481) does shed some light on the issue of 'You-ness', as it has never been clearly defined by either Bashar or Seth. According to this source the new 'You' which is shifting into a new reality by heading into a new direction after taking the respective decisions, is energetically a clone. The history of the new You - created from the present - is identical, as there is no need for a new one. Resulting from key decisions or discretionary activities (relocating or not, sending an important letter or not, leaving the country or not, attending a business meeting or not, etc...) the present is created differently and so is the future. Thus, the probable You will split off from the You you know yourself to be. It has its own 'I'-identity. The newly emerging future will take place in a parallel reality and follow its own logic, which provides for further bifurcations leading (the new You) into a myriad of additional probable timelines (and probable selves/clones). It is in principle infinite.

It may be important to emphasize that in both, Bashar's and Willa's cosmology any shifting self assumes automatically a different history as the history must 'linearly make sense' for the self in order to have reached the point where it is now/then (i.e. after the shifting). In any case, 'probable selves' are not really part of Bashar's vernacular as every change or move is a 'total change' and is usually subsumed under the term 'parallel'.

If you click on the link below and scroll down the text you can find a depiction of the bifurcations of probable selves and timelines.

https://www.eliasforum.org/digests/esse ... ssion.html

----------
(Excerpt):

....
....
....

JOE: Well, it’s my understanding — and correct me if I’m wrong — that probable selves originate within an individual focus. Correct, incorrect?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JOE: Okay. Where and how do these probable selves branch off? Exactly how do the alternate realities that these probable selves inhabit work in relation to this reality? How does one keep track of the other, or how do they share information, or in what ways do they relate within an individual focus? And from your perspective, how can you pick one self that is me from another probable self that may have branched off? Or am I way off base? Maybe that’s not how it works at all. I really don’t have much of an understanding, even though there has been a lot explained by you and by others.

ELIAS: Very well.

First of all, I shall express to you a distinction between probable realities and alternate realities. I express this distinction for the reason that alternate realities are occurring continuously within your actual reality and your individual dimension that you occupy within this one focus.

Alternate realities are a continuous action that are occurring involving all of the different aspects of you as this one focus, which all occupy this one dimensional reality.

A probably reality holds a difference, for a probable reality and probable selves move into the position of what you may term as a parallel reality.

Now; first of all, let me also express to you that there are many more parallel realities than merely probable realities, but as we shall confine ourselves to this one subject matter of probable selves and probable realities, we shall direct our attention into this one area in this discussion, and not be involving all of the other parallel realities which are also created and within existence, in your terms.

In this, as you look to an individual focus, such as yourself, you choose within essence to be manifest as a focus of essence, a focus of attention, into one particular manifestation, one time framework, one location, one particular objective reality, and as you move through that one particular focus, you create lines of probabilities.

As I have expressed previously, as you choose to be manifest within physical reality, you enter that physical reality holding what may be termed as a pool of probabilities that you allow yourself to draw upon, and in this, there are many lines of probabilities that you allow yourself to choose from, in a manner of speaking.

This is quite figurative, for be remembering that all probabilities are created and actualized within the moment. They are not an element or a thing that is set before you or in front of you that you choose from. But in this, as you enter into a physical manifestation in one focus, you hold this pool of probabilities, and in this pool of probabilities, there are, as I have stated, many different lines of probabilities that you choose.

Each line of probabilities that you choose to be actualizing in this particular physical dimension and objective reality creates a specific direction, and as you choose a specific direction, you also are NOT choosing to be inserting into this objective reality many other choices, but all choices are actualized. They are merely not all actualized in this one objective reality, for this is the manner in which you have created this particular physical reality.

Therefore, as you move through your individual focus and you create what you view as large or direction-altering choices within your focus, you also are creating, simultaneously, probable realities.

Now; these probable realities are directly related to the physical reality that you are experiencing, and they are actualizing the choices that you have chosen NOT to be inserting into your physical objective reality. Therefore, as an example, as you choose to be actualizing one probability of engaging an intimate relationship in partnership with another individual and you choose to be moving in a direction of probabilities with that individual, you each also are creating probable realities with probable selves that are creating many, many different choices that you have NOT chosen to insert into your objective physical reality.

This creates a type of parallel dimension in which you have created another you, which shall continue and shall be creating different choices from the choices that you view that you choose, but shall appear almost identical to you. Certain qualities of the probable self shall be different, but many of the manifestations of the probable self shall be the same as you.

In a manner of speaking, this is a type of action that you create within your physical focus which may be likened to the creation of clones. You create a clone of yourself and insert this into a probable reality, which becomes a probable dimension or parallel dimension to the dimension that you are experiencing, and from that point, that probable self holds its own individual identity and reality.

Now; realize that to that point, prior to that point, that probable self was not a probable self yet. It was an element of you, an aspect of you, an alternate self of you. At the moment that you choose an alteration in your direction within your physical reality, within your focus, you also create, figuratively speaking, a type of split, and in this split, you create the movement of a particular aspect of yourself, of this individual focus, which moves away from you — or what you recognize as you — and is inserted as almost a separate entity into a parallel reality.

Now; this parallel reality parallels your reality in the existence of its past, for its past shall immediately and simultaneously be created within that moment, for it has already experienced its past, for it is you. Its future and its present may deviate and may not necessarily continue in a parallel line, for at the moment of the choice or the figurative split, the probable self now holds its own reality and it creates its own choices, and it moves futurely within linear time framework into its own reality and shall hold its individual free will and personality and choices.

Therefore, this would be the distinction that is created between an actual parallel dimension, which is not a probable dimension, and a probable dimension holding probable reality and probable selves.

In this, the probable reality holds the ability to be moving away from a parallel line in its creations, and may be creating choices that in actuality are quite different from your choices, and in this, in like manner to yourself, it may also choose to be quite altering of its individual choices and personality expression, dependent upon its individual creations.
....
....
....

Re: reality is a reflection

99
In the transmission ‘Tis the season’ Bashar shares with us ‘the impact, the results, the effects of the change we have made in the energy shift recently, so that we may understand how we have altered the course of our own history in the future’. Obviously referring to the outcome of the US elections he is explaining that the shift is not confined to one country, but comes with profound rippling effects across the entire globe.

One of the main effects of the new energy pattern towards and into which we are heading collectively is the acceleration of the beginning of the window of open contact. It has been brought back now to the year of 2023 (from 2025 onwards). Equally, around that time or earlier we will discover that life may exist on other planets, helping us to change our mindset regarding the idea that intelligent life and advanced technological life may exist elsewhere in the cosmos. There may be also more profound, more recognizable UFO sightings in that year.
He is basically sharing with us a ‘gift in this season of giving’, which will help accelerate our development towards the new reality. He encourages us to do three simple acts which work as a unit together: make contact – plant a tree – do a kindness, which should be perceived holistically as they are interrelated in what they represent: connection to the stars – connection to earth – connection to humanity and all beings in creation.

Ad 1: We should go out in the desert, the forest, to the ocean, to areas that are relatively calm and peaceful and isolated and open up to the idea of contact, e.g. by means of meditating or just staring at the stars, etc.

Ad 2: Willa’s suggestion is to go out and plant a tree. The physical act of planting a tree or a flower, or anything that grows in the earth does connect us to the earth and helps us understand not only that we are surrounded by nature but that we ourselves are an expression of nature.

Ad 3: The third act is to do a favour to somebody, be it a friend or a stranger. Even the simplest act of providing help or support to someone who doesn’t expect such kindness or assistance will brighten their day and make them feel more connected.

Bashar: ‘Make contact, plant a tree, do a kindness. These are the gifts from us to you and through these very simple acts will you be capable of accelerating your reality in the direction of the version of earth that will be far more representative of the joy, the harmony, the love, the creativity, and the peace that always resides within your soul’.

Re: reality is a reflection

100
Seth: ‘Your consciousness is not a thing that you possess. Your individuality is not a thing with limits. If you ask, "What is my individuality in all of this?" or, "Which I am I?" then you are automatically thinking of yourself as a psychological entity with definite boundaries that must be protected at all costs. You may say, "I was born in a house on a certain street in a certain town, and no present belief to the contrary will change that fact." If, in the present, one past event can be altered within your neuronal structure, however, then basically no event is safe from such change’, (The Nature of Personal Reality, Chapter 14; ‘Which World, Which You - Your daily reality as the specific expressions of probable events’).

According to Seth, there are probable future events as well as probable past events. Future events are a selection of probabilities. Probable future events are brought into actuality by utilizing the body’s nerve structure through intensified will or conscious belief. Thus, through the filtering activities of the brain, separating certain non-physical events from others, probabilities that are of non-physical origin become physically valid. This applies to ‘past’ events as well. They can still happen within our personal previous experience – NOW. They continue to exist and develop, and they come with their own (probable) futures.

Seth: ‘The "you" that you presently conceive yourself to be represents the emergence into physical experience of but one probable state of your being, who then directs corporeal life and "frames" and defines all sense data. When your ideas about yourself change, so does your experience’ (Ibid.)

https://ia801607.us.archive.org/20/item ... eality.pdf