Re: reality is a reflection

71
Illustrating the ‘shifting’. Please have a look at the attached slides.

Slide No 1 is a depiction of the infinite number of ‘parallel universes’ (in Bashar’s vernacular) through which we are constantly ‘shifting’, thus creating the illusion of movement and time. Actually we do not SHIFT in the narrow sense, we ‘reproduce’ the universe, i.e. our individual, specific universe with the specific and unique chairs and tables, billions of times per second. (creating, collapsing to zero, creating, collapsing to zero, etc.). This is what Seth calls the ‘blinking of the universe’ and Tom Campbell the ‘ticking of the universe’. With the rate of Planck-time. When we ‘tick’ along from the previous reality production frames (-3, -2, -1,) to any given now-moment, we have the impression of a specific past, constituted by the frames (-3, -2, -1) and supported by the related memories. Without changing the vibration of our belief systems significantly, we can thus plausibly extrapolate from the ‘past’ and get a likely future, made up of the reality frames 1, 2, 3, etc.

If we changed the vibration of our belief systems, thoughts, and emotions significantly, we could and would alter our future (green dots). As we are making the connections to our ‘past’ reality production frames ALWAYS in the present, as the past does not exist (‘physically’), we would get a ‘new history’ which would seem to have been our true history, the one which brought us linearly speaking to our new future without logical inconsistencies.

Sometimes the memory does not adjust fully to the new reality path we have ‘chosen’, resulting from the changes in our belief systems and the respective signature vibration (the signature vibration of the beliefs is the determinant for the reality production - without belief systems no frames), then we have ‘false’ memories. Some call this the ‘Mandela effect’. It would be a ‘false’ memory of having been at the blue ‘-3’, whereas we opted for a new history which ‘came’ with the new future resulting from the significant changes we made in the present. We should remember the green ‘-3’, but somehow we recall the blue ‘-3’. And we cannot understand what is going on with our brain.

For the slides please use the following link (powerpoint attachment): http://www.powerfulintentions.org/forum ... _com_forum

According to Bashar even our collective history has changed and is likely to change again. Provided we are on the right track. 2020 seems to be a crucial year in that regard. Some versions of earth have already been destroyed. Other versions still exist. Some versions will be hit by Apophys in 2036. Others will have ‘first contact’ by then. Some do not have the same location anymore in the physical universe, others are ‘heaven on earth’ (Bashar). The splitting of timelines is smooth and follows the day-to-day logic of events. There are no obvious frictions (apart from ‘Mandela-effects’ which are rather minor inconsistencies). We always have the impression of continuity. Big events cover several timelines and send ripples through the ‘fabric of spacetime’.

Neither the ‘past’, nor the ‘future’ do exist, as there is always only ONE now-moment, in which we create a new universe over and over again. There is only HERE, there is only NOW. Time and movement are illusions, caused by the constant re-creation of reality frames (the ‘shifting’). The illusion of time and movement enables us to have experiences. Only the experiences are real. The rest is an illusion. It is a giant stage, albeit a projected one.
Du hast keine ausreichende Berechtigung, um die Dateianhänge dieses Beitrags anzusehen.

Re: reality is a reflection

72
'The End of Time', scientific literature recommended by Bashar in: 'Our Future in the 21st Century', (1:10:50)

'Richard Feynman once quipped that "Time is what happens when nothing else does." But Julian Barbour disagrees: if nothing happened, if nothing changed, then time would stop. For time is nothing but change. It is change that we perceive occurring all around us, not time. Put simply, time does not exist.
In this highly provocative volume, Barbour presents the basic evidence for a timeless universe, and shows why we still experience the world as intensely temporal. It is a book that strikes at the heart of modern physics. It casts doubt on Einstein's greatest contribution, the spacetime continuum, but also points to the solution of one of the great paradoxes of modern science, the chasm between classical and quantum physics. Indeed, Barbour argues that the holy grail of physicists--the unification of Einstein's general relativity with quantum mechanics--may well spell the end of time.
Barbour writes with remarkable clarity as he ranges from the ancient philosophers Heraclitus and Parmenides, through the giants of science Galileo, Newton, and Einstein, to the work of the contemporary physicists John Wheeler, Roger Penrose, and Steven Hawking. Along the way he treats us to enticing glimpses of some of the mysteries of the universe, and presents intriguing ideas about multiple worlds, time travel, immortality, and, above all, the illusion of motion.
The End of Time is a vibrantly written and revolutionary book. It turns our understanding of reality inside-out'. (Amazon Teaser)

Re: reality is a reflection

74
'Parallel Reality Wheel'

The objective of the transmission ‘Parallel Reality Wheel’ is to encourage us to use our imagination to shift more consciously into the direction of the reality we say we prefer. To this end Bashar is presenting a graphic covering eight different parallel realities which do exist and which are equally real as ours, with minor and major deviations from the reality we currently think we are familiar with. In one of these parallel realities, the theory of relativity was developed by an individual whose name was not Albert Einstein, but Albrecht Eisenstein. In another parallel reality John F. Kennedy was not killed in 1963, in a third one the American continent is being governed by Native Americans and in a fourth one The Roman Empire did not crumble. There is a reality version where a female president was elected in the US in 2012 and another one where the ceiling in the Sistine Chapel had not been painted by Michelangelo, but by Boticelli. Finally, there is a version where the territory of the US is part of a much larger Atlantean Empire and finally a version where peace reigned in the Middle East after the ending of the six-day war between the Arabs and Israel in 1967 (without commenting on the relative likeliness of finding a lasting peace solution in the Middle East as opposed to the continuing existence of Atlantis).

What we consider to be a single, coherent timeline (our ‘life’) is in fact based on a conglomerate of a large number of different reality versions of Earth, i.e. an infinite number of static reality frames we are constantly ‘shifting’ through in order to create the illusion of time and movement. Basher emphasises that for the purpose of this specific transmission, the terms ‘parallel reality’, ‘alternate universe’, ‘alternate timeline’, or ‘parallel timeline’ are being used somewhat interchangeably. We are invited to explore the idea of these parallel realities in a meditative state with the objective of stretching our ‘imagination muscles’ to get more freedom in terms of unlocking from what we consider to be ‘our history’. Again, he is underlining that the past and the future are always created in the present by making new connections to the frames of the ‘past’ which we do no longer need. With the new information in mind, we can begin contemplating more consciously a wider range of probabilities which are at hand and more in alignment with our passion and creativity. This approach could support us by providing more leeway regarding our probable future and would change the past accordingly.

Re: reality is a reflection

76
The following slides ('shifting II') indicate what is meant to be achieved when meditating on the eight different parallel reality timelines. By stretching our imagination we may be able to leave the likely extrapolation which comes with what we think is our past. By actively detaching from ‘the past’ and breaking the continuity a little bit, we have more freedom to be the person we prefer to be and thus we are able to contemplate future parallel realities (different frames numbered 5 and 6) which would otherwise not have been within the (vibratory) range of our future probabilities.

Actually, in previous transmissions, Bashar mentioned several times that what looks to be ‘our lifetime’, coming from ‘the past’, leading to a present moment in the now, along with the respective memories that make it look to be our linear history, is the result of a zig-zag path through an infinite number of parallel reality frames. So anytime we navigate ourselves through different frames in the present we bring along with that the illusion of a linear ‘past’ - and an extrapolated range of probable futures - that seem to consistently support our understanding of the person we are in the now, with a linear history that always makes sense to have brought us without frictions to the place where we currently are (slide No. 2).

In exceptional cases we retain memories from past reality frames which are no longer ‘ours’ as we changed our vibration in the now, thus creating a new past and a new range of probable futures from the now. This is what we then call the Mandela effect (blue -3).

Link to the attachment (Shifting II):
http://www.powerfulintentions.org/forum ... _com_forum

Re: reality is a reflection

77
When asked directly about the Corona virus, Bashar explains that it may have been actually manipulated through human intervention to a certain extent - based on fearful beliefs - but he refuses to elaborate further on what he calls the ‘side-effect’ of this event, as the point to concentrate on is the question WHY the virus ‘made itself available’ for being used in that way.

Bashar: ‘I am not saying that it has not been in some ways manipulated by humanity, but it began as a natural virus, and that is what we are focusing on so that you can understand why it wound up the way it wound up, even if someone has been manipulating it, it started to be manipulated because of its tendency to cross barriers through the destruction of the natural environment on your planet’ (Parallel Reality Wheel).

The ‘point not to be missed’ over concomitant conspiracy aspects he does not want to delve into is for us to understand and take on the responsibility for why the world is out of balance, and why these things occur, i.e: the destruction and the imbalance that exists on our planet through fear-based beliefs.

He describes a method of eliminating ‘the expression of the virus’ in our reality altogether by using resonant frequencies to mitigate the detrimental aspects of this organism. We should find the frequency of the organism itself, and while embedding it in its own frequency, integrate it in ‘a harmonic of another frequency eleven times greater’, and the virus would actually cease to thrive in our reality. This approach is applicable to any disease.

Re: reality is a reflection

78
“You have a greater identity outside of your context, yet a part of it is inside your context, as you. Your youness is your significance, a focus of awareness, conscious of itself, that seeks out and views experience with its own unique propensities. The existence of probable realities and probable selves in no way denies the validity of your own experience or individuality. That rides secure, choosing from unpredictable fields of actuality those that suit its own particular nature.” Seth: ‘Unknown Reality’, Vol.1, Session 682 February 13, 1974

“Anything you can imagine is being played out in some parallel reality versions of you. The ‘real’ you is All-that-is. You are All-that-is experiencing itself as an aspect of itself, but that takes nothing away from the fact that you are All-that-is. Every single one of you, every single one of us, every single being within creation is All-that-is experiencing itself from another point of view, from another perspective within itself. You are already there( i.e: 'it') because it is you.” Bashar: ‘Voices in Your Head’, 2014

Re: reality is a reflection

79
When asked about the different parallel reality frames we are constantly ‘shifting’ through in order for us to create the illusion of time and movement, Bashar’s explanation given in the ‘Parallel Reality Wheel’ – session was relatively comprehensive and clear.

Bashar: ‘You are not in all of them. The idea is that each of those versions is its own distinct person. But the idea is that what you experience through continuity as a change in yourself is not a change in your personality. It is a shift of your consciousness to express itself through a completely different personality, a completely different person. So any change, as we have said, is a total change. And since you are shifting billions of times per second, you are literally shifting your consciousness through billions of people per second, billions of versions of you, but versions of you are not you in the sense of the personality, its only you in the sense of your consciousness, your overall consciousness that perceives itself to be itself, but any change in what you consider your personality to be is actually your consciousness now perceiving through a different person entirely’.

Using the graphic (link below) it becomes obvious that we should not identify ourselves with any of the lines of frames we are ‘shifting’ through. We should rather perceive ourselves to be just the ‘NOW’—point, i.e. the dark green circle in the middle of any perceived timeline, constantly changing its vibration, thus ‘organizing’ a new history and a new future which comes with the modified vibration of the new state of being we are in. The ‘timelines’ are just convenient illusions, as they are created from the NOW-point in the middle anyway - by constantly collapsing and recreating a new universe (YOUniverse) which is then more in line with our slightly modified state of being in the new 'now'.

It would help to visualize ourselves as a spotlight or a projector, illuminating the dots from behind, thereby activating them for a moment as an informational nodal point, thus creating the illusion of ‘being’ in a specific parallel reality frame, before moving on to the next one. We should identify ourselves rather with the projector/focus, not with the parallel reality frame and the associated personality structure or the respective timeline which comes with that frame.

Then it would be easier to understand that the question of ‘what happens to the frames we left a moment ago’ becomes relatively obsolete, as those frames continue to 'exist'. They may be ‘lit’ by the ‘spotlights/projectors’ of other individuated ‘I’-consciousnesses expressing ‘another aspect’ (Bashar) of the greater being that ‘we’ are and that we will recognize ourselves to be as soon as we perceive ourselves from a higher perspective (i.e. a conglomerate of aspects/focuses). Leaving the frame does not mean we are 'shifting' the body into another frame. It means we are creating an entirely new universe and are looking through the eyes of our body who is already there.

Bashar: ‘Other aspects of the greater being are expressing themselves through it simultaneously. It’s not a matter of the idea of leaving it empty. It’s a matter of the idea of understanding that what ‘your greater being experienced a moment ago’ as coming through one personality, is still being experienced by that aspect of your greater being, but now the greater being has also allowed itself to experience another personality perspective and that’s going on simultaneously too; its simply shifting, in a sense, it’s attention in a certain way to allow that personality to think it’s the only one having that experience’.

Thus, the terms to ask for are ‘aspects’, ‘focus’, and 'individuated stream of consciousness', rather than ‘timeline’, ‘person’, ‘personality construct’, etc. as the latter ones are frame-specific and - for us - ephemeral. This applies as well to the different realities in the context of the splitting train tracks.

‘Only the aspects of those people that belong in that reality are in that reality with you. Even if there is a representation of them still there and they seem to have changed the way they behave, it isn’t really that they have, it’s just that you are getting the version of them that belongs in that reality and you make the continuity connection or assumptive jump that they have changed, but they haven’t really, it’s just that you are now interacting with the person that is representative of being in that reality with the version of you that belongs in that reality. It’s just that your consciousness is now looking through those eyes and theirs is looking through those eyes in that reality thinking that that is one reality and in fact it is when the other reality you thought you left is still going on. But you are not experiencing it anymore from your perspective. Yes, this is the matrix.’ (Bashar: ‘Total Impact’, 2005).

The concepts presented by Seth decades earlier may further help to shed some light on the way how we are constructing our realities. They may be all the more instrumental in this context as they can be presumed to concur with Bashar's cosmology. 'Everything that Seth is saying is correct' (Bashar). Core terminology is, however, used differently.


Seth: ‘There are units of consciousness, then, as there are units of matter. I do not want you to think of these units as particles:

• There is a basic unit of consciousness that, expressed, will not be broken down.
• The basic unit of consciousness obviously is not physical.
• It contains within itself innately infinite properties of expansion, development, and organization; yet within itself always maintains the
kernel of its own individuality.
• Despite whatever organizations it becomes part of, or how it mixes with other such basic units, its own identity is not annihilated.
• It is aware energy, identified within itself as itself, not “personified” but Awareized.
• It is therefore the source of all other kinds of consciousness, and the varieties of its activity are infinite. It combines with others of its
kind, forming then (organizations or gestalts of awareness) …
• This basic unit is endowed with unpredictability. That very unpredictability allows for infinite patterns and fulfillments.
• You would call a soul the result of a certain organization of such units, which you would then recognize as a “soul.”
• Their nature is the vitalizing force behind everything in your physical universe, and others as well.
• These units can indeed appear in several places at once, and without going through space, in your terms.
• Literally now, these basic units of consciousness can be in all places at once. They are in all places at once.
• They will not be recognized because they will always appear as something else.
• Of course they move faster than light.
• There are millions of them in one atom—many millions.
• Each of these units is aware of the reality of all others, and influences all others.
• These units can move forward or backward in time, but they can also move into thresholds of time with which you are not familiar.
• All probabilities are probed and experienced, and all possible universes created from these units. Therefore, there are realities in
which the endless probabilities of one given event (underlined) are probed, and all experience grouped about that venture.
• These units of consciousness do not have human characteristics, of course. They do, however, possess their own “inclinations,”
leanings, propensities.
• They are vitalized, aware, charged, with all the qualifications of being.
• All psychological structures then are composed of such organizations.
• They are innately endowed with the desire or propensity for growth and creative organization. They are not found alone, then, in
isolation.
• Since these units of consciousness exist at once, they are aware of all the organized self-structures of which they are a part. To this
extent, all probable realities are connected in that basic manner.
• Since I have told you that in your terms your past, present, and future exist at once, these units are constantly emerging out of your
NOW-POINT from both the future and the past.
• All matter is based upon these units.’

Link to the attachment (Shifting II):
http://www.powerfulintentions.org/forum ... _com_forum

Re: reality is a reflection

80
'You-ness' maybe another key concept that could help closing gaps in understanding reality. The term was used by Seth only once, unfortunately without further definition. It is occasionally used by Bashar as well and may provide an appropriate approach for dealing with the spotlight/projector/individuated stream of consciousness
------------------------------

"The so-called stream of consciousness is simply that — one small stream of thoughts, images, and impressions — that is part of a much deeper river of consciousness that represents your own far greater existence and experience. You spend all your time examining this one small stream, so that you become hypnotized by its flow, and entranced by its motion. Simultaneously these other streams of perception and consciousness go by without your notice, yet they are very much a part of you, and they represent quite valid aspects, events, actions, emotions with which you are also involved in other layers of reality.

“You” are not divorced from these other streams of consciousness in any basic way; only your focus of attention closes you off from them, and from the events in which they are involved. If you think of your stream of consciousness as transparent, however, then you can learn to look through and beneath it to others that lie in other beds of reality. You can also learn to rise above your present stream of consciousness and perceive others that run, for analogy’s sake, parallel. The point is that you are only limited to the self you know if you think that you are, and if you do not realize that that self is far from your entire identity.

You are as actively and vividly concerned in these realities as you are in the one in which your main attention is now focused. Now, as you are merely concerned with your physical body and physical self as a rule, you give your attention to the stream of consciousness that seems to deal with it. These other streams of consciousness, however, are connected with other self-forms that you do not perceive. The body, in other words, is simply one manifestation of what you are in one reality, but in these other realities you have other forms." —Seth Speaks, Chapter 7: Session 531, May 25, 1970