Re: reality is a reflection

36
There is an older video of 2009 where people are explicitly advised not to be gullible (‘Debunking the Debunkers’). However, irrespective of the validity or non-validity of the information allegedly channeled by Daryll Anka, it is recommendable to get familiar with the concepts of quantum physics, probabilities, and the many-worlds-interpretation. A good starting point is the book of Michael Talbot (elaborating on Bohm and Pribram). It is easy to read and understand. There are some videos with Michael Talbot on youtube as well. Furthermore, there is a sequence of 4 or 5 videos providing a comprehensive and visual introduction into some of the core concepts of the physicists, incl. cross-references to Bashar and Seth, when and where appropriate. The title is 'the holographic universe'. Videos with Jim Elvidge (Simulation Theory) and Tom Campbell (My Big Theory of Everything) may help to consolidate the information.

Once you managed to familiarize yourself with the videos and the concepts of the multiverse, the holographic universe, and the simulation theory, you may wish to go back to Bashar, to the sessions where he is talking about the 'rfrkthrm', a civilization able to put their hands on the surface of a black hole, where information is stored in 'I's and '0's. It is digital. The film 'strip' is only an analogy. And as it is digital - and infinite - there is always the right amount of information available for the production of the relevant reality frames. Like in a very sophisticated computer game. Up to the level of the 'One' (Bashar).

The understanding of the information is not so easy on either side of the line. In one of the first videos available from the 80s, Bashar mentioned explicitly how long it took them to finally understand core terminology of the English language. They were in particular struggling with a single word, which was used quite ubiquitously, despite the fact that the meaning of the term is so difficult to capture. It is the word ‘Yabut’. They could hear this word in every second sentence, but for a long time they were not able to assign a clear meaning to it:

Are you happy?, …Yabut...

Do you feel excited?, …Yabut...

The following is the link to the unabridged videos on 'the holographic universe', as well as versions in different languages and transcripts:

http://www.holographicuniverseworkshops.com/

Re: reality is a reflection

37
According to the information provided in the 'nine levels of consciousness' – session, the universe is discrete, not continuous. The production rate of the virtual reality frames corresponds to the ‘ticking’ of the universe. You are contracting to zero and expanding again, at all consciousness levels except the collective agreement level, billions of times per second, thus creating a new universe from moment to moment to moment.

Once you created the new universe, you are in a new reality, with new connections e.g. to the frames you do not need any more. Hence the statement that you are creating the ‘past’ from the present. And as you are basically not more than a fluctuating informational nodal point, made up of the single consciousness particle of existence which creates everything, after every contraction, billions of times per second, the whole multiverse has been changed as well.

The precise interface between your universe and other people’s universes is however not yet clear, apart from the information about the common rules laid down on the collective agreement level (gravity, speed of light, up and down, right and left, etc.). ‘You are creating your version of me, while I am creating my version of you, so basically we are talking to each other’ (Bashar).

In any case, from the information provided follows that you are creating your version of the chair, the table, the room, the house, the street, the city, the country, the continent, the earth, the solar system, the galaxy, the universe. You are re-creating it billions of times per second, and you are – thus – constantly in a new reality.

Everybody else is creating their version of the chair, the table, the room, the house, the street, the city, the country, the continent, the earth, the solar system, the galaxy, the universe. They are re-creating it billions of times per second, and they are – thus – constantly in a new reality.

You are producing your version of other persons, while they are producing their version of you. Like in a computer game. They have to receive all the information pertaining to their ‘reality’ from their angle, not from your angle. So the coordination of differing perspectives, the interface, and the seamless common projection are paramount.

In one of the last sessions Bashar explained that we allow others to affect us only to the extent we agree. ‘...that we allow ourselves to be affected by others only to the extent we agreed or pre-agreed’ may be a proper formulation in this context, as the higher levels were mentioned.

According to the explanation provided by Bashar the higher mind of the other actors involved may or may not play an active part in the friendly or not so friendly interactions between the avatars (e.g. 10%, 30%, 70% etc.). The versions of us who are reading these lines are the avatars (‘versions’ in his terminology). If we don’t like what we see we can change the scenario from the avatar-level by modifying the vibration of our beliefs and definitions.

Without beliefs and definitions we cannot play the reality game. Because we have to insert a specific (vibrational) value into the reality production ‘equation’ (Bashar). The game is not real. It is a projection of consciousness within consciousness. Only the experience is real.

Re: reality is a reflection

39
Von den Sessions. Ich denke die Kosmologie ist jetzt klarer. Sie ist ziemlich nah an der Simulationstheorie (Jim Elvidge/Tom Campbell). Es macht in der Tat mehr Sinn, zunaechst mit der Simulationstheorie zu beginnen, da dann vieles von dem was Bashar versucht zu uebermitteln viel verstaendlicher wird.

Er benutzt seine Begriffe zu den Parallelrealitaeten und den parallelen Existenzen etc. nicht trennscharf. Das hat mit der Uebermittlung zu tun. Die Informationen kommen nicht von ihm, sondern vom Schiff. Sie muessen mehrfach uebersetzt werden auf dem Weg zu Darryl. Die Syntax scheint hierbei wichtiger zu sein als die Vokabeln. Was einmal erfolgreich uebermittelt wurde kann also einfacher ein zweites mal oder ein drittes mal in derselben Art und Weise (hintereinandergeschaltete Schnittstellen der 'Uebersetzungen') uebermittelt werden. Daher die Tendenz zur Wiederholung.

Aber es ist dennoch eine Menge an Information. Sie wird allerdings klarer und leichter zu ordnen vor dem Hintergrund der Beitraege der Physik. Ein Interview mit Jim Elvidge und Tom Campbell findet sich hier:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s56gowkWvqw

Dolly never wore braces. Or did she?

40
Dolly never wore braces. Or did she?

https://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/article ... ear-braces

Regarding the splitting of the train tracks, you are on the right track if you decide to be on the right track. If you are in doubts as to whether you are on the right track you are (possibly) not on the right track (a typical Bashar statement).

Not all of the persons you can currently see around you will come with you. If there is no version of them which is compatible with the vibration of the new collective consciousness, no version of them is available to join you.
Earth population will diminish as a result of this process. This does not necessarily imply a disaster. Rather the result of the splitting and the reduced number of compatible versions.

From your point of view, there are suddenly no more wars and no atrocities on tv. From the other version's point of view, you die, you have an accident or you vanish in any other possible way that is compatible with the logic of the collective consciousness prevailing on the other tracks. No paranormal events or frictions. The splitting is smooth. That was his statement in one of the older sessions.

Some versions of earth may be hit by Apophys in 2036 (Jupiter the eye of the storm, 2013)